chapter 6

Question 2:
a)
|
|
Break even analysis: finds the amount of time needed for the cumulative cash flow from a project to be equal to its initial and ongoing investment. |
|
|
Present value: The current value of a future cash flow. |
|
|
Net present value: uses a discount rate determined from the company's capital to get the present value of a project, cash receipts and outlays. |
|
|
Return on Investment: is the ratio of the net cash receipts divided by the cash outlays of the project. |
b)
|
|
Economic feasibility: A process of identifying the costs and financial benefits associated with a development project. |
|
|
Legal and contractual feasibility: The process of assessing potential legal and contractual ramifications due to the construction of a system. |
|
|
Operational feasibility: The process of assessing the degree to which a proposed system solves business problem or takes advantage of business opportunities. |
|
|
Political feasibility: The process of evaluating how key stakeholders within the organization view the proposed system. |
|
|
Schedule Feasibility: The process of assessing the degree to which the potential time frame and completion dates for all major activities within a project meet organizational deadline and constrains for affecting change. |
c)
|
|
Intangible Benefit: A benefit determined from the creation of an information system that cannot be easily & exactly measured in dollars . |
|
|
Tangible benefit: A benefit determined from the creation of an information system that can be easily & exactly measured in dollars . |
d)
|
|
Intangible cost: A cost associated with an IS that can not be easily or certainly measured in dollars . |
|
|
Tangible cost: A cost associated with an IS that can be certainly & easily measured in dollars . |
Question 3:
|
|
Net
present value: |
|
|
Return
on Investment: |
|
|
Break-even
analysis: |
Question 6:
1-Political.
2-Schedule.
3-Operational.
4-Technical.
5-Legal and contractual.
6-Economic.
Question 8:
1- Large projects are riskier than smaller projects.
2- A system in which the Requirements are messy ill-structured ill defined or subject to the judgment of an individual
will be riskier than one in which requirements are easily obtained and highly structured
3- The development of a system employing commonly used or standard technology will be less risky than one employing novel or non-standard technology.